The analytical argument in 16 pages. Three-layer configuration conflict, dispositif paradox, adversary coherence asymmetry, and eight forward projections — with selected evidence.

Core findings in three pages. What the architecture delivers, where it fractures, and why the system provides no early warning of carrying capacity limits.

Forensic structural diagnosis of NATO's coordination architecture across seven dimensions, three narrative instances, and sixty canonical theories. 347 footnotes, open-source evidence throughout. Cut-off 8 April 2026.